I received an email with a good point about my rant on MacIntel’s <\/p>\n
We’ll see, I guess. I think the CPUs themselves will be standard,
\nbut that the motherboard designs will not.<\/p>\n
Why use standard CPUs? Because they’d be cheaper than custom<\/b> fabs.<\/i><\/p>\n
In the past Apple boards utilized fewer chips than PC’s instead relying on software and CPUs and ASIC’s. This would make a Pentium unable to perform as fast running windows as a PC type board would. While this would still work, no one would want to install and run Windows on an Apple Intel system. Running Windows Applications, Yes, Windows OS NO! Custom ASICs are more expensive than dedicated chips for I\/O etc. So Apple is going to go cheap, then a generic PC mother board via Intel. And we are back into what distinguishes Apple from Dell. Something in hardware is got to give. <\/p>\n
But from the Rosette emulation only translating G3 code currently on the Pentium 4 that makes the P4 a third class citizen to the PowerPC G5. The Pentium 4 will need to take two steps forward to put Apple back into the same place it’s at. Again making the idea of a different Pentium being in the works. Not custom<\/b>, but a new Pentium that doesn’t comply with generic Windows design.<\/p>\n
One other note, Why not a new Pentium customized for Linux, It’s the Hear<\/b> no evil, See<\/b> no evil, Do<\/b> no evil. I don’ hear<\/b> any manufacture asking for a Pentium for Linux, I don’t see<\/b> anyone building a system for Linux, and I don’t do<\/b> custom CPU’s without a customer. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I received an email with a good point about my rant on MacIntel’s We’ll see, I guess. I think the CPUs themselves will be standard, but that the motherboard designs will not. Why use standard CPUs? Because they’d be cheaper…<\/span><\/p>\n