{"id":497,"date":"2007-12-10T21:54:15","date_gmt":"2007-12-10T20:54:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.branedy.net\/?p=497"},"modified":"2007-12-10T21:54:15","modified_gmt":"2007-12-10T20:54:15","slug":"pattern-matching-vs-prediction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/?p=497","title":{"rendered":"Pattern Matching vs Prediction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I stumbled upon this article about <a href=\"http:\/\/members.verizon.net\/~vze3fs8i\/air\/pres2008.html\">Who Will Win the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election?.<\/a> And realized that what they we claiming here was not a predictive  method, but merely these people&#8217;s attempt to fit, to pattern match, &#8216;Presidential Electability&#8217; factors to winners of elections. And making a half hearted attempt to apply these historical factors to up coming election. I&#8217;ll give you some examples, these are the factors they used in a previous &#8216;prediction&#8217; <a href=\"http:\/\/members.verizon.net\/~vze3fs8i\/air\/pres2004b.html\">Who Should Win the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election?<\/a> they used factors like<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> if the candidate served as Director of Central Intelligence (e.g., George H. W. Bush), was a four- or five-star general officer in the United States Armed Forces (e.g., Dwight D. Eisenhower), or <strong>ordered the combat use of nuclear weapons<\/strong> (e.g., Harry S. Truman),\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>as you can see such &#8216;factors&#8217; could only be applied to demonstrate why Truman beat Dewey, not as a general rule that proves the model.The factors used in the 2008 &#8216;prediction&#8217; only suggest combinations of Presidential candidates , but can not predict them, because the factors are based on historical artifacts as part of the pattern matching, factors that can not be predicted in advance.<\/p>\n<p><p>With that in mind there are no factors for emotional content, or future historical events.<\/p>\n<p>They further go on to make this statement, <strong><em>We assume that major party primary voters are rational and will understand the empirical power of our algorithm.<\/em><\/strong> and we all know that voters for both nominees or candidates are not rational.  And with a model that does not factor the level of &#8216;rational&#8217; or irrationality of the electoral process, they can not forecast or predict. In other words, they can&#8217;t put their money where their mouths are.<\/p>\n<p>They make another bold statement <strong><em>Readers of this paper could make a lot of money at <a href=\"http:\/\/intrade.com\">Intrade.com<\/a> if our assumption that major party primary voters are rational is correct.<\/em><\/strong>  but you don&#8217;t see them making money.<\/p>\n<p>The old adage is this, never take investment advice from a poor broker.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I stumbled upon this article about Who Will Win the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election?. And realized that what they we claiming here was not a predictive method, but merely these people&#8217;s attempt to fit, to pattern match, &#8216;Presidential Electability&#8217; factors<span class=\"ellipsis\">&hellip;<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/?p=497\">Read more <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Pattern Matching vs Prediction<\/span><span class=\"meta-nav\"> &#8250;<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[66,44,8,28,45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-497","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-election","category-gambling","category-politics","category-psychology","category-statistics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=497"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/497\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=497"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.branedy.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}